Publications
As official journal of the Surgical Outcomes Club, JAMA Surgery provides SOC members with free access to high-quality articles, multimedia, and learning tools. Click here to access them.
Big Data Research in Surgery
Best Practices for Big Data Sources and Methods
Arya S, Dossett LA, Kibbe MR. Best Practices for Big Data Sources and Methods in Surgery. JAMA Surgery. 2025, 160(3):245-246.
-
Greenup RA, Chu D, Pawlik TM. Practical Guide to Administrative and Billing Big Data Sources. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(3):342-343.
-
Fayanju OM, Haut ER, Itani KM. Practical Guide to Clinical Big Data Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(3):344-346.
-
Backhus L, Adkar S, Klarin D. Practical Guide to Multiomics Big Data Sources. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(3):347-348.
-
Ross EG, Arya S, Melcher ML. Practical Guide to Image-based Big Data Research. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(4):455-456.
-
Fong Y, Melstrom L, Evans HL. Practical Guide to Remote Patient Monitoring in Surgical Patients. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(4):457-458.
-
Merkow RP, Haynes AB, Boermeester MA. Practical Guide to Patient-Generated Data Sources. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(4):459-460.
-
Hashimoto DA, Dimick JB, Pugh CM. Practical Guide to Use of Stimulation and Video Data. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(5):586-587.
-
Loftus TJ, Haider A, Upchurch GR. Practical Guide to Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Large Language Models in Conducting and Reporting Research. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(5):588-589.
-
Kothari AN, Kaji AH, Melton GB. Practical Guide to the Use of AI-Enabled Analytics in Research. JAMA Surgery. 2025; 160(5):590-591.
Guide to Statistics and Methods
Surgical Outcomes Club/JAMA Surgery Effective Use of Reporting Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Surgical Research
Brooke BS, Ghaferi AA, Kibbe MR. Effective Use of Reporting Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Surgical Research. JAMA Surgery. 2021, 156(6):515-516
-
Haynes AB, Haukoos JS, Dimick J. Trend Reporting Guidelines for Nonrandomized/Quasi-Experimental Study Designs. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(9):879-880.
-
Merkow RP, Kaji AH, Itani KM. The CONSORT Framework. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(9):877-878.
-
Arya S, Kaji AH, Boermeester MA. PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(8):789-790.
-
Pitt SC, Schwartz TA, Chu D. AAPOR Reporting Guidelines for Survey Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(8):785-786.
-
Fayanju OM, Haukoos JS, Tseng JF. CHEERS Reporting Guidelines for Economic Evaluations. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(7):677-678.
-
Patzer RE, Kaji AH, Fong Y. TRIPOD Reporting Guidelines for Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(7):675-676.
-
Massarweh NN, Haukoos JS, Ghaferi AA. ISPOR Reporting Guidelines for Comparative Effective Research. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(7):673-674.
-
Dossett LA, Kaji AH, Cochran A. SPQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(9):875-876.
-
Brooke BS, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(8):787-788.
-
Kelz RR, Schwartz TA, Haut ER. SQUIRE Reporting Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(6):579-581.
-
Ghaferi AA, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. STROBE Reporting Guidelines for Observational Studies. JAMA Surgery. 2021; 156(6):577-578.
The Methodology Toolbox
Surgical Outcomes Club/JAMA Surgery Health Services Research Methodology Series
Ghaferi AA, Haider AH, Kibbe MR. Maximizing the Impact of Surgical Health Services Research – The Methodology Toolbox. JAMA Surgery. 2020, 155(3):190-191
-
-
Schwarze ML, Kaji AH, Ghaferi AA. Practical Guide to Qualitative Analysis Data. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(3):252-253.
-
Dossett LA, Kaji AH, Dimick JB. Practical Guide to Mixed Methods. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(3):254-255.
-
Arya S, Schwartz TA, Ghaferi AA. Practical Guide to Meta-analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(5):430-431.
-
Brooke BS, Kaji AH, Itani KM. Practical Guide to Cost-effectiveness Analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(3):250-251.
-
Merkow RP, Schwartz TA, Nathens AB. Practical Guide to Comparative Effectiveness Research Using Observational Data. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(4):349-350
-
Scott JW, Schwartz TA, Dimick J. Practical Guide to Health Policy Evaluation using Observational Data. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(4):353-354.
-
Davidson GH, Haukoos JS, Feldman LS. Practical Guide to Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(5):432-433.
-
Neuman HB, Kaji AH, Haut ER. Practical Guide to Implementation Science. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(5):434-435.
-
Brasel K, Haider A, Haukoos J. Practical Guide to Survey Research. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(4):351-352.
-
Segev DL, Haukoos JS, Pawlik TM. Practical Guide to Decision Analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2020; 155(5):436-437.
-
Practical Guides to Data Sets Series
Surgical Outcomes Club/JAMA Surgery Practical Guides to Data Sets Series
Haider AH, Bilimoria KY, Kibbe MR. A Checklist to Elevate the Science of Surgical Database Research. JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(6):505-507.
| Data Source / Database | Clinical Disciplines | Organization(s) | Patient Population | Access | Procedure & Diagnosis Codes | Analytic Variables* | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Health Record (EHR, e.g., Cerner, Epic) | All | Institution-specific | All | Institution-specific | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All | Highly granular; opportunity for researcher to personally verify data accuracy and completeness; longitudinal data | Social history often absent/outdated; free-text sociodemographic or lifestyle data often unavailable; structured/unstructured mix complicates research extraction |
| VA Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) | All | Veterans' Administration | All patients at VA Medical Centers | Free to VA-employed or WOC investigators | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All | 60+ integrated databases; data since early 1990s; longitudinal | Requires programming expertise; analyses restricted to VA research environment |
| VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) | All | Veterans' Administration | VA surgical patients | Free to VA-employed or WOC investigators | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except Pharmacy and Cost; 30-day longitudinal | Standardized nurse abstraction; high reliability; improved outcomes; linkable to CDW | Limited to 30-day outcomes; lacks long-term follow-up without linkage |
| National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) | All | American College of Surgeons | Patients at participating hospitals | Volunteer institutions (~700) | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except Pharmacy; 30-day longitudinal | Modeled after VASQIP; rich perioperative variables; validated outcomes | Participation cost; limited facility-level adjustment; 30-day outcomes only |
| All of Us Research Program | All (EHR-based) | NIH | US volunteers (goal 1M) | Tiered access via CDR | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except cost; includes SDOH, PROs | Inclusive recruitment; OMOP standardized data; genomics and biospecimens | Analysis restricted to Researcher Workbench; complex data model |
| Epic Cosmos | All (EHR-based) | Epic | 246M patients from Epic systems | Free to contributing organizations | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except cost; SES; longitudinal | Unified cross-system patient records; SDOH included | Epic-only bias; data quality depends on contributing systems |
| PCORnet | All (EHR-based) | PCORI | 140M US patients | Free to contributing members | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except cost; SES | Standardized Common Data Model; claims + PRO linkage | Variable EHR quality; harmonization challenges |
| VA Million Veteran Program (MVP) | All (EHR-based) | Veterans' Administration | US veteran volunteers | Free to VA-employed or WOC investigators | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All; SES (Medicaid eligibility) | Genomics, surveys, biospecimens, EHR, VA-Medicare linkage | Administrative burden; VA population selection bias |
| Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Databases | Cardiac, Thoracic | STS | Patients at participating sites | By request to STS | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except cost; 30-day longitudinal | High participation in cardiac surgery; rich covariates | Procedure-based; limited long-term outcomes and PROs |
| Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) | Hernias | ACHQC | Patients of ACHQC surgeons | Member-only | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except Labs, Pharmacy, Cost | Hernia-specific metrics; PROMIS and HerQLes PROs | Strict reporting restrictions; limited generalizability |
| National Cancer Database (NCDB) | Surgical Oncology | ACS Commission on Cancer | Patients at CoC-accredited programs | Free to CoC facilities | ICD-O-3 | All except Labs, Pharmacy, Cost | TNM staging; facility-level data; large coverage | No recurrence data; hospital-based selection bias |
| Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) | Surgical Oncology | NCI | ~30% of US cancer cases | Public (SEER*Stat) | ICD-O-3 | All except Labs, Pharmacy, Cost | Population-based; incidence, mortality, survival trends | No recurrence; limited treatment granularity |
| Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) | Transplant Surgery | UNOS / OPTN | Transplant recipients and donors | Public (fee) | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except cost; graft survival | Mandatory reporting; national transplant outcomes | Limited access/context variables; reporting variability |
| ACS Trauma Quality Programs (NTDB) | Trauma | ACS Committee on Trauma | 900+ trauma centers | Public | ICD-9/10 | All except Pharmacy and Cost | Largest trauma dataset; rare injury analysis | Voluntary submission; missingness variability |
| Society of Vascular Surgery VQI Registries | Vascular Surgery | Society of Vascular Surgery | US, Canada, Singapore | Member-only | CPT, ICD-9/10 | All except Labs and Cost | Procedure-specific registries | No centralized event adjudication |
* Analytic Variables include: Operative, Labs, Pharmacy, Cost, Age, Race, Ethnicity, Sex, SES, Longitudinal, Comorbidities, Vital Status.
- Stulberg JJ, Haut ER. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (NIS). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(6):586-587.
- Doll KM, Rademaker A, Sosa JA. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(6):588-589.
- Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Medicare Claims Data. JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(6):677-678.
- Schoenfeld AJ, Kaji AH, Haider AH. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Military Health System Tricare Encounter Data JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(7):679-680.
- Massarweh NM, Kaji AH, Itani KMF. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(8):768-769.
- Raval MV, Pawlik TM. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Pediatric NSQIP. JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(8):764-765.
- Telem DA, Dimick JB. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Program (MBSAQIP). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(8):766-767.
- Merkow RP, Rademaker AW, Bilimoria KY. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Cancer Database (NCDB). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(9):850-851.
- Hashmi ZG, Kaji AH, Nathens AB. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(9):852-853.
- Desai SS, Kaji AH, Upchurch G. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Improvement Program (SVS VQI). JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(10):957-958.
- Farjah F, Kaji AH, Chu D. Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database. JAMA Surgery. 2018; 153(10):955-956.
-
Viewpoints
Kelz RR, Brooke B, Dossett L. Leveraging the Health Services Research Toolbox for Surgical Education Research. JAMA Surgery, 2022; 157(8):649-650.
Pitt SC, Dossett LA. Deimplementation of Low-Value Care in Surgery. JAMA Surgery, 2022; Epub Ahead of Print.
Massarweh NN, Ghaferi AA, Kelz RR. Achieving Critical Mass in Surgical Outcomes Research. The Changing Role of the Surgical Outcomes Club. JAMA Surgery, 2020; 155(10):911-912.



